Ontario · College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

How to Respond to a CPSO Complaint

9 min readLast updated July 14, 2026

A letter from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario is one of the more unsettling pieces of post a physician can receive. But the Ontario complaints process is more predictable than it first appears, and one feature of it shapes everything else: in most cases the committee that decides your file will never meet you. It reads what you write. Understanding that changes how you should respond.

Before you do anything: a complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing, and most complaints do not end in discipline. Read the letter carefully, note the deadline, and contact the CMPA before you draft a word. Do not amend the medical record, and do not contact the complainant.

Who regulates physicians in Ontario

Physicians in Ontario are registered and regulated by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO). Its authority comes from the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 (RHPA), the Health Professions Procedural Code — Schedule 2 to that Act — and the Medicine Act, 1991. In Ontario you do not hold a “licence” in the American sense: you hold a certificate of registration, and it is that certificate which is at stake in a regulatory matter.

Complaints are not decided by CPSO staff. They are screened by a statutory committee, the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC), made up of physicians and public members. The ICRC is the body whose decision you are ultimately writing for, and understanding that shapes everything about how you respond.

The College must investigate almost every complaint

Under section 25(1) of the Code, the CPSO is required to investigate and act on complaints. It has very limited discretion to decline. The ICRC may dismiss a complaint it considers frivolous, vexatious, made in bad faith, moot or otherwise an abuse of process — but before it does, it must give notice to both you and the complainant and allow 30 days for submissions.

The practical consequence is that receiving a complaint tells you almost nothing about its merit. The CPSO receives more complaints about physicians than any other regulator in Canada, and a large proportion end in no action or advice. A complaint is the opening of a file, not a finding against you.

The 30-day response — and why it usually matters more than anything else

You will normally receive a letter from the CPSO enclosing the complaint, and you will generally be asked to respond in writing within 30 days. Read that letter closely and diarise the deadline immediately. If you need more time, ask for it early rather than missing it.

Here is the point that physicians most often miss. The ICRC generally does not hold a hearing. It reviews the file on paper: the complaint, your written response, the investigator’s report and your records. In most complaint files, your written response is your only opportunity to make submissions. You will usually not get to sit in front of the panel and explain your reasoning, and you may not get a second chance to add what you left out.

The single most common mistake: writing a short, defensive reply that answers the complaint in general terms. If your response does not address every specific concern the complainant raised, the ICRC may never hear your explanation of it at all.

What to do in the first week

  1. Contact the CMPA immediately. This is the first call, not the last. Do not send a draft response to the College before you have taken advice.
  2. Secure the record. Retrieve the complete chart. Never alter, add to or “tidy” a record after a complaint arrives — late amendments are discoverable, and they turn a care issue into a probity issue, which is far more serious.
  3. Note the deadline and any request for records.
  4. Do not contact the complainant. Approaching a patient who has complained about you can itself become the subject of a further complaint.

You may disclose the patient’s health records to the College without the patient’s consent; section 43(1)(b) of the Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 permits disclosure to a College for the purpose of an investigation.

What a strong response actually contains

An effective response is structured, complete and measured. It should set out the clinical context and your reasoning at the time, address each concern the complainant raised individually, and be supported by the record. Where something did go wrong, saying so plainly — and explaining what you have done about it — is almost always more persuasive than a defensive account that a panel can see through.

Note that even where the ICRC concludes your care was appropriate, it will still assess the quality of your documentation. Record-keeping is one of the most frequent grounds on which Ontario physicians attract ICRC action, and it is often the issue that turns an otherwise defensible complaint into a caution or a remedial order.

What the ICRC can decide

After the investigation and review, the ICRC may take no further action; issue written advice or recommendations; require you to appear before a panel to be cautioned in person; require you to complete a Specified Continuing Education or Remediation Programme (SCERP); accept an undertaking; refer allegations of professional misconduct or incompetence to the Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal; or refer the matter for an inquiry into your capacity to practise.

Transparency matters here. SCERPs, oral cautions and referrals to discipline are published on your profile on the CPSO Public Register, where patients, employers and hospitals can see them.

Timelines and review rights

Section 28 of the Code sets a target of 150 days from receipt of the complaint for the ICRC to dispose of it. That target can be extended, and in practice many files take longer.

If you or the complainant disagree with an ICRC decision on a public complaint, it can be reviewed by the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board (HPARB), an independent tribunal, within 30 days. HPARB’s jurisdiction is narrow: it looks only at the adequacy of the investigation and the reasonableness of the decision. It cannot review a decision that refers a matter to the Discipline Tribunal.

Key takeaways

  • Ontario physicians hold a certificate of registration from the CPSO, governed by the RHPA, the Health Professions Procedural Code and the Medicine Act, 1991.
  • Under section 25(1) the College must investigate and act on complaints; it can only dismiss frivolous, vexatious, bad-faith, moot or abusive complaints, and only after 30 days’ notice.
  • You will normally have 30 days to respond in writing — and because the ICRC decides on the paper record without a hearing, that response is usually your only chance to be heard.
  • Never alter a record after a complaint arrives. PHIPA s.43(1)(b) lets you disclose records to the College without patient consent.
  • ICRC outcomes range from no action and advice through oral caution and a SCERP to referral to the Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal. SCERPs, oral cautions and discipline referrals appear on the Public Register.
  • Section 28 sets a 150-day disposal target; ICRC complaint decisions can be reviewed by HPARB within 30 days on adequacy and reasonableness only.

Related courses

Practical, self-paced CPD courses that map onto the issues in this guide. These are educational courses. They are not accredited by the CPSO and are not a substitute for legal advice.

Continue reading: Ontario doctors

What happens during a CPSO investigation? Remediation and reflection for Ontario doctors

Frequently asked questions

Does a CPSO complaint put my certificate of registration at risk?
Most do not. The CPSO receives more physician complaints than any other Canadian regulator, and a large share end in no action or advice. Only a small minority are referred to the Discipline Tribunal, which is the stage at which registration is genuinely at stake. A complaint is the start of a process, not a finding — but it still needs a careful, complete and timely response.
How long do I have to respond to a CPSO complaint?
You will generally be asked to respond in writing within 30 days of notification. If you need longer, request an extension early rather than letting the date pass. Contact the CMPA before you draft anything.
Will I get to explain myself in person to the ICRC?
Usually not. The ICRC ordinarily decides on the documents alone — the complaint, your written response, the investigator’s report and the records — without an oral hearing. That is why your written response must address every concern raised, in full, the first time.
Can I give the College my patient’s records without their consent?
Yes. Section 43(1)(b) of the Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 permits disclosure of personal health information to a College for the purposes of an investigation. What you must never do is alter, supplement or rewrite the record after the complaint arrives.
What is a SCERP?
A Specified Continuing Education or Remediation Programme. It is a remedial order the ICRC can make requiring a physician to complete specified education or remediation — for example on record-keeping, boundaries, communication or prescribing. SCERPs are published on the physician’s CPSO Public Register profile.
Can I appeal an ICRC decision?
A decision on a public complaint can be reviewed by the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board within 30 days. HPARB considers only whether the investigation was adequate and whether the decision was reasonable. It has no jurisdiction over decisions referring a matter to the Discipline Tribunal, and decisions arising from a Registrar’s investigation under section 75 cannot go to HPARB at all — they can only be judicially reviewed.

This article is general information for physicians registered with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario and does not constitute legal advice. Regulatory processes and the law change, and every case turns on its own facts. If you are the subject of a complaint or investigation, contact the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) or a lawyer experienced in professional regulation before you respond. Last updated July 14, 2026.

Scroll to Top