Home/Knowledge & Support/New York Dentists

New York · State Dental Boards

New York dentist discipline: from consent order to license suspension

6 min read · Updated July 2026

If an Office of Professional Discipline investigation leads to charges, most New York dentists resolve the case one of two ways — a negotiated consent order, or a formal hearing before a panel of the State Board for Dentistry. This guide explains both routes, the penalties the Board of Regents can impose, the lasting consequences of a disciplinary finding, and how a dentist can strengthen their position.

How does New York discipline dentists?

Once the OPD brings formal charges under Education Law §6510, a dentist faces two main routes to resolution. The first is a negotiated consent order; the second is a formal disciplinary hearing before a panel of the State Board for Dentistry. A settlement conference before a member of the Board of Regents is a further option for reaching agreement.

In every route, the Board of Regents takes final action and the Commissioner of Education issues the order. The advisory State Board for Dentistry supplies the professional expertise — both in charging decisions and on hearing panels — but does not itself impose the penalty.

What is a consent order and how does it work?

A consent order is a negotiated settlement with the OPD, broadly similar to a plea agreement in a criminal case. The dentist agrees to admit certain charges and accept a specified penalty, and the agreement is then submitted to the Regents Review Committee and the Board of Regents for acceptance. Many cases are settled by consent order before ever reaching a hearing.

A consent order gives a dentist a measure of control over the outcome — the penalty is known and negotiated rather than imposed after a contested hearing. Whether it is the right choice is a legal judgement, and it should be weighed carefully with counsel and a considered response to the charges.

What happens at a formal disciplinary hearing?

If the case is not settled, it proceeds to a formal hearing before a panel drawn from the State Board for Dentistry, with an Administrative Officer presiding. The panel hears evidence, including witnesses and documents, and makes findings of fact and a recommendation on both guilt and penalty.

That recommendation passes to the Regents Review Committee and then to the Board of Regents, which votes on the final determination; the Commissioner of Education issues the order. A dentist who disagrees with the outcome may seek review through an Article 78 proceeding in the Appellate Division, Third Department.

What penalties can the Board of Regents impose?

The penalties available under Education Law §6511 run, in ascending order, from censure and reprimand, through fines of up to $10,000 per specification, probation with conditions, and suspension — which may be actual or stayed (allowing continued practice under monitoring) — up to revocation of the licence. Conditions such as coursework, supervision or practice limits are often attached.

The Regents weigh the seriousness of the conduct, any patient harm, the dentist's history, and evidence of insight and remediation in deciding where within that range a case falls. A stayed suspension with probation is a very different outcome from revocation, and mitigation is what moves a case toward the lighter end.

What are the consequences of discipline for a dentist?

A disciplinary outcome reaches well beyond the penalty itself. Any settlement or finding after a hearing is public permanently, appearing under the Enforcement Actions tab of the OP's Online Verification Search. It is typically reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank, and can affect hospital privileges, insurance-panel participation, DEA registration, and licences held in other states.

This is why even a seemingly minor charge deserves a serious, well-advised response — the record outlives the penalty, and credentialing bodies routinely check it.

Is there an alternative for impairment or minor issues?

Yes. For dentists whose ability to practise is impaired by alcohol or drugs and who have not harmed patients, the OP's Professional Assistance Program (PAP) allows a voluntary, confidential surrender of the licence while the practitioner completes an approved course of treatment. Successful completion can act as an alternative to public discipline.

For minor, technical matters an administrative warning may resolve the case without formal charges at all. Both routes reflect a system that distinguishes between practitioners who need support or correction and those whose conduct requires sanction.

How do you strengthen your position?

The dentists who achieve the best outcomes engage early and build a genuine mitigation record. That means retaining experienced counsel, preserving the record intact, and being able to evidence insight, reflection and remediation — a candid account of what went wrong, corrective changes to systems, and targeted education in the area of concern.

Completing relevant courses will not erase a charge, but it demonstrates the change the State Board and the Regents look for, and can meaningfully move a penalty from actual suspension toward a stayed suspension or probation.

This article is general information for dentists, not legal advice. Regulatory processes change and every case turns on its own facts — confirm current requirements with the New York Office of the Professions, the State Board for Dentistry, and your own attorney before acting.