Home/Knowledge & Support/Georgia Psychologists

Georgia · State Psychology Boards

Georgia psychologist discipline: from consent order to license suspension

5 min read · Updated July 2026

If a Georgia Board of Examiners of Psychologists investigation leads toward formal action, most psychologists resolve the matter one of two ways — a negotiated consent order, or a contested hearing after referral to the Attorney General. This guide explains the disciplinary process end to end: letters of concern, private and public consent orders, what happens at a hearing, the penalties the Board can impose, the consequences, and how a psychologist can strengthen their position.

How does Georgia discipline psychologists?

When an investigation points toward a violation, the Board has a graduated set of responses. It may issue a non-disciplinary letter of concern, negotiate a consent order, or refer the case to the Attorney General for formal charges and a contested hearing. In every route, the Board makes the final decision.

This graduated approach means that many matters are resolved without a contested hearing at all — particularly where the psychologist engages constructively and the conduct, while a concern, does not threaten the public.

Letters of concern and consent orders

A letter of concern is a non-disciplinary, advisory response — the Board's way of flagging an issue, sometimes with recommended or required education, without imposing formal discipline. It is the lightest touch available.

A consent order goes further: it is a negotiated settlement in which the psychologist agrees to the facts and to specified terms — which may include a fine, required courses, supervision, or practice conditions — in place of a contested hearing. Consent orders must be approved by the Board.

Private vs public consent orders

Georgia distinguishes between two kinds of consent order, and the difference matters. A private consent order is confidential — typically used for lesser or technical matters, such as a continuing-education lapse — and does not appear on the public record.

A public consent order, by contrast, is a public disciplinary record. Which one applies depends on the seriousness of the conduct, and it is a central point to weigh with counsel, because a public order carries reporting and reputational consequences that a private one does not.

What happens if the case goes to a hearing?

If no agreement is reached, the matter is referred to the Attorney General and proceeds as a contested case under the Georgia Administrative Procedure Act (Title 50, Chapter 13), before the Board or its hearing officer. Both sides present evidence and argument, and the psychologist is entitled to be represented.

The Board issues the final decision. A psychologist who disagrees with the outcome may seek judicial review in the superior court under the Administrative Procedure Act.

What penalties can the Board impose?

The Board's sanctions run, in ascending order, from a reprimand, through a fine of up to $500 for each violation and recovery of the Board's investigative and legal costs, probation with conditions, and restriction or suspension of the license, up to revocation or refusal to renew. Probationary terms often include required education, supervision, or monitoring.

Because the fine is capped per violation, the number of violations matters. The Board weighs the seriousness of the conduct, any client harm, prior history, and evidence of insight and remediation — and a reprimand or probation is a very different outcome from suspension or revocation.

What are the consequences of discipline?

A public disciplinary outcome reaches well beyond the penalty itself. A public consent order or final order is a public record, and discipline is typically reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank. It can affect licences held in other states, hospital and facility privileges, and insurance-panel participation.

This is why even a seemingly minor complaint deserves a serious, well-advised response — the record outlives the penalty, and credentialing bodies routinely check it. Where a matter can properly be resolved by a letter of concern or a private consent order, the difference is significant.

How do you strengthen your position?

The psychologists who achieve the best outcomes engage early and build a genuine mitigation record. That means retaining experienced counsel, preserving the record intact, and being able to evidence insight, reflection and remediation — a candid account of what went wrong, corrective changes to practice, and targeted education in the area of concern, whether that is boundaries, confidentiality, or general ethics.

Because Georgia consent orders so often require education, arriving with that work already underway is especially persuasive — it can move a case toward a letter of concern or a private order rather than a public suspension.

This article is general information for psychologists, not legal advice. Regulatory processes change and every case turns on its own facts — confirm current requirements with the Georgia State Board of Examiners of Psychologists and your own attorney before acting.